Frank Daniels v. Bernard J. Brennan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \it is of little consequence that Daniel's lawsuit was relatively younger than most cases in which we upheld dismissal under Rule 41(b)\
• holding that “it is of little consequence that Daniel’s lawsuit was relatively younger than most cases in which we upheld dismissal under Rule 41(b)”
• discussing standard for dismissal under rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the model for Rule 123(b)
• affirming district court’s dismissal for want of prosecution despite lack of prejudice shown
• failure to tender the pretrial order is a sound reason to refuse to reinstate a case
• “A trial court’s 23 authority to dismiss a case is not dependent on a showing of prejudice by the 24 defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).