Frank D. Unger and Sherri J. Unger v. Susan Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this court owes no deference to an agency's interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation if that interpretation is \inconsistent with the regulation\ or not the \agency's fair and considered judgment\ (citations omitted)
• “Generally, an agency’s interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation is ‘controlling’ unless ‘plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.’” (quoting Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 461 (2010))
• “An agency’s decision need not be ideal or even, perhaps, correct so long as not arbitrary or capricious and so long as the agency gave at least minimal consideration to the relevant facts as contained in the record.” (internal quo- tation marks omitted)
• reviewing a grant of summary judgment de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).