Frank C. Pollara Group, LLC v. Ocean View Investment Holding, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellants could not make an argument on appeal that raised fact issues not argued in a Rule 50 motion
• noting that “*[a]pplication of [the gist of the action] doctrine frequently requires courts to engage in a factually intensive inquiry as to the nature of a plaintiff's claims’”
• “[Application of this doctrine frequently requires courts to engage in a factually intensive inquiry as to the nature of a plaintiffs claims.”
• “[A] party may not appeal an order denying summary judgment after a full trial on the merits.”
• “[I]f a party fails to object to an inconsistency in a general verdict before the jury is excused, that party waives any objection in that regard.”
• “[I]f a party fails to object to an inconsistency in a general verdict before the jury is excused, that party waives any objection in that regard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).