Frank Brunckhorst Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant's argument that survey in which fewer than 3% of all participants identified mark with plaintiff failed to show confusion, because 34% of the participants who had a belief as to the source of the mark identified it with plaintiff
• a random or probability sampling is entitled to more weight than a face-to-face mall intercept, which is not random
• “BOAR’S HEAD” v. “Boar’s Head Red”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).