Frank Brill v. McDonald Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if we were to conclude that some earlier order in the sequence could have been appealed... the eventual judgment... would not become less open to appellate review.”
• “Because the City of Seattle had no constitutional duty to protect 1 the Pioneer Square Plaintiffs against violence from members of the riotous crowd, ‘its failure to 2 do so-though calamitous in hindsight-simply does not constitute a violation of the Due Process 3 Clause.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).