Skip to main content
· 6/4/2002

Francisco v. Stolt Achievement MT

Citations

  • 293 F.3d 270
  • 2002 A.M.C. 1529
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10683
  • 2002 WL 1163526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Convention Act requires that the arbitration take place in a signatory nation
  • holding that one party to the agreement must be a citizen of a foreign nation for the Convention Act to apply
  • holding that the agreement must be in writing for the Convention Act to apply
  • holding that a POEA contract “clearly provides remedies for work-related personal injuries.”
  • stating that the arbitration agreement must arise out of a commercial legal relationship for the Convention Act to apply
  • determining that a Filipino seaman who had signed an employment contract containing an arbitration clause was enough to constitute an agreement in writing to arbitrate the dispute per the Convention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Reavley, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.