Francisco S. Morales v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff failed to state due process claim because he did not have property interest in his tenure as village manager
• finding that plaintiff failed to state due process claim because he did not have property interest in his tenure as village manager
• failing to follow procedures established by state law does not violate the federal Constitution
• “We regularly dis- parage arguments … that procedures required by state law create property interests and hence lead to a federal No. 16-3456 11 requirement that state procedures be used.”
• claim alleging contractual right to severance pay was properly addressed by “a hearing from a state court, which could award severance pay or another appropriate remedy”
• “We regularly dis- parage arguments … that procedures required by state law create property interests and hence lead to a federal No. 16-3456 11 requirement that state procedures be used.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).