Fourth Circuit· 4/27/2016
Francisco Mena v. Loretta Lynch
Citations
- 820 F.3d 114
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7632
- 2016 WL 1660166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “consent” essential to extortion stands in marked contrast to the type of “consent” underlying an embezzlement offense, which is “closely related” to the crime of fraud
- explaining we are “obliged” to conduct that analysis and “may not simply rest our decision on some concept of common 13 USCA4 Appeal: 25-4048 Doc: 53 Filed: 05/22/2026 Pg: 14 of 26 sense”
- explaining we are “obliged” to conduct that analysis and “may not simply rest our decision on some concept of common 13 USCA4 Appeal: 25-4048 Doc: 56 Filed: 05/26/2026 Pg: 14 of 26 sense”
- explaining that lack of consent is essential
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkinson, Shedd, Agee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Garfield Lawrence v. Loretta LynchFourth Circuit· 2016-06-17· cited 69×
- Melvin Rodriguez Cabrera v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2019-07-19· cited 34×
- Gabriel Santos Alvarez v. Loretta LynchFourth Circuit· 2016-07-07· cited 22×
- Winsome Elaine Vassell v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2016-10-21· cited 9×
- K. A. v. Attorney General United StatesThird Circuit· 2021-05-04· cited 6×
- Melvin Funez-Ortiz v. James McHenry, IIIFourth Circuit· 2025-02-04· cited 5×
- Winsome Elaine Vassell v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2016-06-13· cited 1×
- Samir Baptista v. Pamela BondiFourth Circuit· 2025-05-01
- United States v. Raquan ScottFourth Circuit· 2026-05-22
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court· 2013-04-23· cited 1,263×
- Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 405×
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 320×
- Mellouli v. LynchSupreme Court· 2015-06-01· cited 301×
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 246×
- Grin v. ShineSupreme Court· 1902-12-01· cited 164×
- United States v. Ellison M. StocktonFourth Circuit· 1986-04-09· cited 124×
- Maydai Hernandez-Avalos v. Loretta LynchFourth Circuit· 2015-04-30· cited 109×
- Omima Ibrahim Soliman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralFourth Circuit· 2005-08-22· cited 98×
- Sayed Omargharib v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2014-12-23· cited 84×
- United States v. Alfred SmithFourth Circuit· 2004-06-24· cited 37×
- Julio Castillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2015-01-14· cited 37×
- GARCIA-MADRUGABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2008-07-01· cited 33×
- R. B. Boone v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1956-07-17· cited 27×
- United States v. Michael Stanley WaronekSeventh Circuit· 1978-09-05· cited 24×
- Sandra Espinal-Andrades v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2015-01-22· cited 19×
- Holt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1930-03-01· cited 19×
- Universal Maritime Service Corporation v. Bernard N. Wright Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborFourth Circuit· 1998-08-19· cited 18×
- United States v. Allen Ray JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1979-12-28· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.