Francisco Garcia v. David Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a suspect answering “no” to the question “[d]o you wish to talk to me?” was an unambiguous request to remain silent under Miranda
• holding that a suspect answering “no” to the question “[d]o you wish to talk to me?” was an unambiguous request to remain silent under Miranda
• the defendant unequivocally invoked his right to silence by saying “No,” to the question “do you wish to talk to me?”
• “[The Brecht] standard is satisfied if the record raises ‘grave doubts’ about whether the error influenced the jury’s decision.”
• “[The Brecht] standard is satisfied if the record raises ‘grave doubts’ about whether the error influenced the jury’s decision.”
• response of “a simple ‘no’” when police asked, after giving Miranda warnings, “do you wish to talk to me?” was sufficient to invoke right to remain silent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).