· 5/14/2004
Francis v. Rodman Local Union 201 Pension Fund
Citations
- 367 F.3d 937
- 361 U.S. App. D.C. 314
- 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2610
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9428
- 2004 WL 1073816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to resolve the dispute over the standard of review of the pension plan’s interpretation because it was “plain that the Fund would be the victor under either standard of review”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.