Skip to main content
· 5/14/2004

Francis v. Rodman Local Union 201 Pension Fund

Citations

  • 367 F.3d 937
  • 361 U.S. App. D.C. 314
  • 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2610
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9428
  • 2004 WL 1073816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to resolve the dispute over the standard of review of the pension plan’s interpretation because it was “plain that the Fund would be the victor under either standard of review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.