Francis v. Lilly's

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When making findings about a claimant’s RFC, an ALJ many not avoid conducting the ‘detailed assessment’ referenced in SSR 96-p ‘by merely indicating that the claimant can perform, simple, unskilled work.’ ”
• “The ALJ omitted the conclusions of several medical sources that supported [the p]laintiff’s credibility and omitted any mention of [the p]laintiff's prescription regimen and the individual and combined side effects of his medications[.]’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).