Skip to main content
· 5/31/1892

Francis v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad

Citations

  • 110 Mo. 387
  • 19 S.W. 935
  • 1892 Mo. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the right to use and enjoy property is an important substantive right” under New Hampshire l a w
  • addressing issues in the first instance to the extent that they involved questions of law
  • upholding zoning ordinance prohibiting correctional facilities because city could reasonably conceive asserted concerns about correctional facilities in the community to be true and prohibition on facilities therefore could conceivably serve legitimate government interest
  • “[T]he [discovery] rule and the fundamental equitable considerations underlying it appl[y] to medical malpractice cases generally. As such, the legislature may not abolish the discovery rule with respect to any one class of medical malpractice plaintiffs.”
  • discussing intermediate scrutiny test in equal protection context
  • describing the development of tiered judicial scrutiny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacFarlane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.