Francis v. Heater v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• found no case in which the giving of the instruction in an FELA case was alone held to be reversible error
• found no case in which the giving of the instruction in an FELA case was alone held to be reversible error
• mere “speculation, conjecture and possibilities” are not sufficient to create a jury question on causation (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).