Francis v. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the injuries must relate to work being done by the injured party, but the injury-producing defect need not be the object of the injured party’s work.”
• finding that Chapter 95 is an exclusive remedy and precludes common law negligence liability
• examining the applicability of Chapter 95 involving a negligent owner and the same passive-owner argument
• analyzing plaintiff’s failure to meet evidentiary burden under section 95.003 in context of judgment notwithstanding verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).