Francis Nolan Augustine v. John Doe, Deputy Sheriff, Lafayette Parish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “availability of notice and a hearing is therefore irrelevant” to substantive due process claims
• stating that consent to entry is assumed to be sufficient to permit warrantless arrest
• warrantless entry for purpose of arrest and seizure of plaintiffs dog amounted to substantive due process claim such that Parratt-Hudson was inapplicable
• “Parratt posits a distinction between (1) the random and unauthorized (and hence unpredictable) conduct of a state actor, and (2
• “[Qualified immunity and statutory immunity are not synonymous. A party must meet the requirements of each individual immunity in order to enjoy its protection.”
• “Parratt applies only when the nature of the challenged conduct is such that the provision of predeprivation procedural safeguards is impracticable or infeasible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).