Skip to main content
· 10/26/1967

Francis Jarad Schultz v. United States

Citations

  • 384 F.2d 374
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • increasing a sentence after defendant has commenced to serve it is a violation of double jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gewin, Bell, Ainsworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.