Francis Daniel Paluca v. Secretary of Labor, Francis Daniel Paluca v. Secretary of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “holding that district courts have jurisdiction to review [the] Secretary[] [of Labor’s] compliance with the Constitution in its administration of FECA
• remanding because the Secretary’s defense was not “strong enough to render the plaintiffs equal protection challenge Svholly insubstantial.’ ”
• stating, without consid- ering Kyne, that \[f]ederal employees have no right to appeal compen- sation decisions on FECA statutory grounds\
• § 8128(b)’s language “under this subchapter” “refers to statutory, and not constitutional action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).