Francini v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s “amended complaint . . . supersede[d] the original complaint,” and therefore “representations made by [plaintiff] in his original complaint . . . do not bind him”
• \Because the ACRA is modeled after federal employment discrimination laws ... federal case law is persuasive in applying the ACRA.\
• “Because the ACRA is modeled after federal employment discrimination laws . . . federal case law is persuasive in applying the ACRA.”
• plaintiff not required to exhaust collective bargaining agreement remedies before filing disability discrimination claim under the Arizona Civil Rights Act because the “statutory rights of employees are independent of the collective bargaining process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).