Skip to main content
· 6/20/1966

Frances T. Hong v. United States

Citations

  • 363 F.2d 116
  • 18 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6366
  • 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the court “need not, and should not” address the appellant’s qualms with the district court’s oral ruling “[s]ince the District Court made and entered formal and detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamley, Jertberg, Ely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.