· 6/20/1966
Frances T. Hong v. United States
Citations
- 363 F.2d 116
- 18 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6366
- 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5765
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the court “need not, and should not” address the appellant’s qualms with the district court’s oral ruling “[s]ince the District Court made and entered formal and detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamley, Jertberg, Ely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.