· 10/31/2001
Frances E. Weeks v. New York State (Division of Parole) & Patrick Hoy
Citations
- 273 F.3d 76
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 23586
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,822
- 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a \notice of discipline\ and a \counseling memo\ by themselves were insufficient, as a matter of law, to constitute adverse employment action
- holding that a notice of discipline and counseling memo were insufficient to constitute an adverse employment action
- holding that the transfer of the plaintiff to another office and the reassignment of the plaintiffs tasks to colleagues did not constitute adverse actions
- holding that a notice of discipline that had no material effect was not adverse in the 3 context of disparate treatment and retaliation claims
- concluding that “notice[s] of discipline for misconduct and incompetence,” “counseling memo[s],” and “negative job evaluations” “do not establish an adverse employment action for purposes of retaliation” claim under Title VII
- recognizing no adverse employment action when plaintiff was transferred from one office to another and there was “no allegation that the reassignment constituted a demotion or otherwise”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker, Jacobs, Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.