Skip to main content
· 10/31/2001

Frances E. Weeks v. New York State (Division of Parole) & Patrick Hoy

Citations

  • 273 F.3d 76
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 23586
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,822
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a \notice of discipline\ and a \counseling memo\ by themselves were insufficient, as a matter of law, to constitute adverse employment action
  • holding that a notice of discipline and counseling memo were insufficient to constitute an adverse employment action
  • holding that the transfer of the plaintiff to another office and the reassignment of the plaintiffs tasks to colleagues did not constitute adverse actions
  • holding that a notice of discipline that had no material effect was not adverse in the 3 context of disparate treatment and retaliation claims
  • concluding that “notice[s] of discipline for misconduct and incompetence,” “counseling memo[s],” and “negative job evaluations” “do not establish an adverse employment action for purposes of retaliation” claim under Title VII
  • recognizing no adverse employment action when plaintiff was transferred from one office to another and there was “no allegation that the reassignment constituted a demotion or otherwise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Jacobs, Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.