Frances Denney v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In determining the applicant’s right to registration, only the mark as set forth in the application may be considered….”
• court refused to consider “house mark” used - 10 - Serial No. 77666826 in conjunction with the mark at issue, where the house mark was not part of the mark in the application
• “In determining the applicant’s right to registration, only the mark as set forth in the application may be considered; whether or not the mark is used with an associated house mark is not controlling.”
• “In determining the applicant’s right to registration, only the mark as set forth in the application may be considered; whether or not the mark is used with an associated house mark is not controlling.”
• “In determining the applicant’s right to registration, only the mark as set forth in the application may be considered; whether or not the mark is used with an associated house mark is not controlling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).