· 10/6/1975
Fraley v. City of Columbus
Citations
- 423 U.S. 872
- 96 S. Ct. 138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not an abuse of discretion for lower court to deduct public assistance payments from Title VII
- Rule 706 expert appointed after class action settlement to evaluate adequacy of a document filing system
- Rule 706 expert appointed after class action settlement to evaluate adequacy of a document filing system
- defendant's claim that he was \high\ due to an intravenous injection of heroin and preludin two and one-half hours before confessing rejected in view of police testimony that he was coherent
- defendant’s claim that he was “high” due to an intravenous injection of heroin and preludin two and one-half hours before confessing rejected in view of police testimony that he was coherent
- “It is the date of actual remedying of discrimination, rather than the date of the district court’s order, which should govern.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.