Skip to main content
· 10/6/1975

Fraley v. City of Columbus

Citations

  • 423 U.S. 872
  • 96 S. Ct. 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not an abuse of discretion for lower court to deduct public assistance payments from Title VII
  • Rule 706 expert appointed after class action settlement to evaluate adequacy of a document filing system
  • Rule 706 expert appointed after class action settlement to evaluate adequacy of a document filing system
  • defendant's claim that he was \high\ due to an intravenous injection of heroin and preludin two and one-half hours before confessing rejected in view of police testimony that he was coherent
  • defendant’s claim that he was “high” due to an intravenous injection of heroin and preludin two and one-half hours before confessing rejected in view of police testimony that he was coherent
  • “It is the date of actual remedying of discrimination, rather than the date of the district court’s order, which should govern.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.