Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2/10/2006
Fraisar v. Gillis
Citations
- 892 A.2d 74
- 2006 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 65
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that court functionaries have no duty to accomplish service for a pro se litigant or to instruct pro se litigants on the rules of civil procedure
- “The rules governing service . . . [are] to ensure notice . . . .”
- “A court must remain neutral and cannot act as the attorney for [a] litigant[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGinley, Leadbetter, Kelley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Philadelphia v. ManuCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-09-06· cited 39×
- In re Sale of Real Estate by Lackawanna County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-17· cited 21×
- Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-09-28· cited 7×
- In Re the Substitute Nomination Certificate of BarrCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-19· cited 6×
- W.J. McCormick v. Dunkard Valley Joint Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-09-24
- C. Quigley v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-01-28
- In Re: Sale of Real Estate by Lackawanna County TCB ~ Real Owner: G. BrownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-05-10
- Kerns v. ChiodoBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-02-23
- Terrence Clark a/k/a Terrance Clark a/k/a Pooh-Poo v. Warden Scott MiddlebrooksCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2021-10-19
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Pliler v. FordSupreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 1,058×
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court· 2000-01-24· cited 840×
- Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-24· cited 255×
- Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-16· cited 196×
- McCreesh v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-28· cited 124×
- Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-06-24· cited 107×
- McGinley v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-10-11· cited 102×
- Rhoads Et Ux. v. Lancaster Park. Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-22· cited 58×
- Groch v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-03-14· cited 50×
- Cahill v. SchultsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-06-07· cited 37×
- Leidich v. FranklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-16· cited 36×
- Slezynger v. BischakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-06-14· cited 22×
- Teamann v. ZafrisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-06· cited 21×
- Grosso v. LoveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-02· cited 12×
- City of Erie v. StelmackCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-17· cited 10×
- Harris v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-19· cited 9×
- Griffith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-17· cited 7×
- Beglin v. StrattonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-04· cited 6×
- Bass v. CUYLERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-06-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.