Fraiman v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that vicarious standing under Waring appears to apply to the deliberate violation of any third-party's constitutional rights, not just those of a co-defendant
• noting that vicarious standing under Waring appears to apply to the deliberate violation of any third-party's constitutional rights, not just those of a co-defendant
• declaring that even though the holding in Waring was limited to the intentional violation of a co-defendant's rights, a defendant in Alaska has standing to assert the intentional violation of any third person's rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).