Third Circuit· 4/15/1985
Fragale & Sons Beverage Co. v. Dill
Citations
- 760 F.2d 469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that pretextual explanations, “if believed by a jury, would disprove the likelihood of independent action”
- pretextual excuses are circumstantial evidence that can disprove the likelihood of independent action
- pretextual excuses are circumstantial evidence that can disprove the likelihood of independent action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter, III
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferThird Circuit· 2014-04-24· cited 583×
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Third Circuit· 2010-04-16· cited 416×
- Big Apple BMW, Inc. v. BMW of North America, Inc.Third Circuit· 1992-08-06· cited 245×
- Delong Equipment Company v. Washington Mills Abrasive CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1989-11-13· cited 140×
- Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.Third Circuit· 1998-09-09· cited 116×
- Arnold Pontiac-Gmc, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationThird Circuit· 1986-04-01· cited 88×
- Link v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Third Circuit· 1986-04-16· cited 79×
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2015-09-15· cited 67×
- Pumps and Power Company v. Southern States Industries, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1986-05-08· cited 46×
- Tunis Brothers Company, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyThird Circuit· 1985-06-24· cited 40×
- Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.Third Circuit· 1985-05-30· cited 26×
- Business Electronics Corporation v. Sharp Electronics CorporationFifth Circuit· 1986-02-20· cited 25×
- The Garment District, Inc. v. Belk Stores Services, Inc. Mathews-Belk Company Jantzen, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1986-08-26· cited 21×
- Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-09-04· cited 20×
- McCabe's Furniture, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.Eighth Circuit· 1986-08-13· cited 19×
- Bussard v. NeilM.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-09-06· cited 18×
- Deforte v. Borough of WorthingtonW.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-03-04· cited 18×
- American Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. U.R.L., Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-12-07· cited 17×
- University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanE.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-04-17· cited 17×
- Tunis Brothers Company, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyThird Circuit· 1987-08-06· cited 13×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 2,575×
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-10· cited 1,658×
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,218×
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 1,058×
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court· 1919-06-02· cited 958×
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Third Circuit· 1976-04-02· cited 852×
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncThird Circuit· 1980-11-03· cited 334×
- Patricia A. Hollinger, Administratrix of the Estate of Germaine S. Hollinger, Deceased v. Wagner Mining Equipment Company, a Division of Paccar, IncThird Circuit· 1982-01-15· cited 220×
- Coleman Motor Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors CorporationThird Circuit· 1975-11-14· cited 163×
- Cernuto, Inc. v. United Cabinet Corp.Third Circuit· 1979-03-16· cited 137×
- Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life InsuranceThird Circuit· 1984-05-07· cited 92×
- Martin B. Glauser Dodge Co. v. Chrysler Corp.Third Circuit· 1977-11-14· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.