Frady v. Portland General Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that specific injuries may be to “an individual’s right to use and enjoy his real property”
• holding that, in order to establish a prescriptive easement, the plaintiff did not have to show that its use of the land was exclusive or constant, only that it was consistent with the character of the claimed easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).