Skip to main content
· 2/24/1988

Fr. Winkler Kg v. Gene Stoller v. Helmut Winkler, Martha Winkler Fuhst, Kurt Maier, Walter Schnee, and Franz Remensberger. Appeal of Gene Stoller

Citations

  • 839 F.2d 1002
  • 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 650
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that before the parol evidence rule can be applied, there must be a determination as to whether the parties have adopted a writing as the final and complete expression of their agreement
  • reliance upon a promise not to enforce a note does not constitute fraud so as to permit parole evidence of that promise
  • “[Debtor]’s discharge from its obligations under the notes by operation of the Bankruptcy Code does not affect a release of [a guarantor] as guarantor.”
  • discussing case law across the country applying this principle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz, Hutchinson, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.