F.P. v. The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Minor Children E.P. and I.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if we were to conclude that the exhaustion requirement should Cite as 325 Or App 326 (2023
• “Even if we were to conclude that the exhaus- tion requirement should be relaxed under Tuckenberry, such that only preservation-of-error principles were in play, nei- ther of the first two assigned errors is ‘obvious and not rea- sonably in dispute’ so as to qualify as plain error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).