Foxworth v. Pennsylvania State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff established he suffered an adverse employment action by demonstrating he was not hired for the position at issue
• dismissing the plaintiff’s § 9125 claim “because the statute relates to criminal history record information, which Foxworth does not have precisely because his record was expunged”
• “[T]he statute simply does not apply to the case at hand . . . because the statute relates to criminal history record information, which [the plaintiff] does not have precisely because his record was expunged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).