Fox's Foods, Inc. v. Kmart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that the defendant did not intend to perform when the promise was made
• denying summary judgment motion on fraud claim because, among other reasons, the complaint alleged that the defendant intentionally made false assurances about its performance under a contract to keep the plaintiff from asserting its contractual rights against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).