Fox v. Western Pac. R.R.
Citations
- 31 Cal. 538
Syllabus
<p>Condemnation of Land for Railroad.—The Act of 1861, to provide for the incorporation of railroad companies, as amended in 1863, giving to such companies the right to enter on and proceed with the survey and construction of their roads on private lands while proceedings for a condemnation of the same are pend- * ing and before the compensation is paid, upon giving security for the damages when ascertained, is not unconstitutional.</p> <p>Idem.—That clause in the Constitution which provides that private property shall not bo taken for public use without just compensation, does not prohibit the Legislature from authorizing private lands to be entered on and taken possession of for public use while proceedings for condemnation are pending and before the compensation is paid, upon security being given for the payment of the damages when ascertained.</p> <p>¡When Land is “Taken” for Public Use.—Land is not “ taken for public use” in the sense in which the word “taken” is used in the Constitution, until the last act has been performed which, under the mode of condemnation adopted, is required to transfer the title or subject it to the servitude.</p> <p>Idem.—The Legislature possess the constitutional power to prescribe the proceedings by which the taking of land for public use shall be effected, and the time at which, in view of the mode adopted, the taking shall be deemed complete.</p> <p>Act taking- Land for Public Use.—An Act of the Legislature permitting private property to be taken possession of for public use while proceedings for condemnation are pending and before compensation is made, and which further provides that the title shall not pass until compensation has been paid, is not repugnant to the Constitution, whether.read as exacting compensation before the taking, or as permitting the taking before compensation is made.</p>
Judges: Rhodes, Sanderson, Sawyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-01-28· cited 97×
- Martin v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-09-11· cited 49×
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-11-15· cited 37×
- Lamb v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 21×
- Ex parte ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1889-11-15· cited 17×
- Buckwalter v. School District No. 42Supreme Court of Kansas· 1902-11-08· cited 17×
- Davis v. San Lorenzo RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 16×
- City of Needles v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-05-14· cited 11×
- Thomas v. City of Horse CaveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1933-06-13· cited 8×
- Schrader v. Third Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 1937-11-17· cited 5×
- Callahan v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-03-12· cited 2×
- California Southern Railroad v. Colton Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court· 1884-01-19· cited 2×
- Brady v. BronsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1873-07-01
- Central Pacific Railroad v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1873-07-18
- Kanakanui v. United StatesD. Hawaii· 1916-12-09
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Steuart v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1855-06-15· cited 54×
- Isom v. Mississippi Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court· 1858-10-15· cited 46×
- McCauley v. WellerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1859-01-15· cited 43×
- Bensley v. Mountain Lake Water Co.California Supreme Court· 1859-07-01· cited 36×
- McCann v. Sierra CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 30×
- Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court· 1835-07-15· cited 23×
- Smith v. HelmerNew York Supreme Court· 1849-11-07· cited 22×
- Rubottom v. M'ClureIndiana Supreme Court· 1838-05-31· cited 17×
- Hankins v. LawrenceIndiana Supreme Court· 1846-12-03· cited 17×
- People ex rel. Green v. Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court· 1855-01-15· cited 16×
- San Francisco & San Jose Railroad v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 10×
- Johnson v. Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1859-07-01· cited 5×
- Colton v. RossiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1858-07-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.