Fox v. Webb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subject matter jurisdiction established under UCCJA does not confer personal jurisdiction to alter or enforce child support obligations, unless jurisdiction is obtained on grounds other than the UCCJA
• where court observed that that jurisdiction over a \custody determination\ under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act did not confer personal jurisdiction over a non-resident to alter support payments created by another state's decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Warwick v. Gluck
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1988-03-17· cited 19×
• Balestrieri v. Maliska
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-04· cited 12×
• Lofton v. Lofton
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-03-14· cited 10×
• Baggett v. Walsh
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-04· cited 8×
• Hollowell v. Tamburro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 6×
• Jesse v. State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Robinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-15· cited 2×
• Tonkin v. Sonnenberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-16· cited 1×
• Bravo v. Johnson F/K/A Donlan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estin v. Estin
  Supreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 608×
• Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt
  Supreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 348×
• Kreiger v. Kreiger
  Supreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 64×
• Slidell v. Valentine
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-11-12· cited 44×
• Wright v. Wright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-17· cited 20×
• Burch v. Burch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-05· cited 8×
• Overcash v. Overcash
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-12· cited 7×