Fox v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining when district court denied certification of an FLSA collective action, it allowed the named plaintiffs' claims to go forward and dismissed the opt-in plaintiffs without prejudice
• affirming decertification of an FLSA collective action, dismissal of the opt-in plaintiffs, and severance of named plaintiffs into multiple individual actions
• explaining that we have “provisional jurisdiction” to determine whether a district court properly rejected a motion to intervene, and that if its decision was correct, “our jurisdiction evaporates because the proper denial of leave to intervene is not a final decision”
• affirming decertification of an FLSA collective action, dismissal of the opt-in plaintiffs, and severance of each of the named plaintiffs into separate individual actions
• affirming decertification of an FLSA collective action, dismissal of the opt-in plaintiffs, and severance of named plaintiffs into multiple individual actions
• explaining when district court denied certification of an FLSA collective action, it allowed the named plaintiffs’ claims to go forward and dismissed the opt-in plaintiffs without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).