Skip to main content
· 2/8/1962

Fox v. Troup Bros., Inc.

Citations

  • 137 So. 2d 620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “gist of the action” doctrine is designed to maintain the conceptual distinction between breach of contract and tort claims
  • applying the principle set forth in Toy to allegations of fraud in an UM/UIM coverage dispute
  • finding waiver where Appellant failed to establish that the trial court erred and “provide[d] no discussion as to why the attorney-client privilege applied”
  • stating that, the “duty extends to insurance brokers”
  • setting forth the standard of review for a motion for JNOV
  • “[I]t is the duty of the court to discover from the facts alleged in a complaint the cause of action, if any, stated therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull, Carroll, Hendry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.