Skip to main content

Fox v. State

Citations

  • 916 N.E.2d 708
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2441
  • 2009 WL 3817455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the trial court is vested with “broad” discretion in utilizing AMS
  • no abuse of discretion in denying alternative misdemeanor sentencing; record amply supported trial court’s determination that a felony conviction was appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.