Indiana Court of Appeals· 11/16/2009
Fox v. State
Citations
- 916 N.E.2d 708
- 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2441
- 2009 WL 3817455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the trial court is vested with “broad” discretion in utilizing AMS
- no abuse of discretion in denying alternative misdemeanor sentencing; record amply supported trial court’s determination that a felony conviction was appropriate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.