· 6/1/1916
Fox v. Schumann
Citations
- 191 Mich. 331
- 158 N.W. 168
- 1916 Mich. LEXIS 674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where this Court held that it was essential to the sufficiency of the affidavit that it allege not only the sale of beer, but that beer was not permitted to be sold in the in county in which the sale occurred
- where this Court held that it was essential to the sufficiency of the affidavit that it allege not only the sale of beer, but that beer was not permitted to be sold in the in county in which the sale occurred
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bird, Brooke, Cohcurred, Kuhn, Moore, Ostrander, Person, Steere, Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.