Skip to main content
· 6/1/1916

Fox v. Schumann

Citations

  • 191 Mich. 331
  • 158 N.W. 168
  • 1916 Mich. LEXIS 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where this Court held that it was essential to the sufficiency of the affidavit that it allege not only the sale of beer, but that beer was not permitted to be sold in the in county in which the sale occurred
  • where this Court held that it was essential to the sufficiency of the affidavit that it allege not only the sale of beer, but that beer was not permitted to be sold in the in county in which the sale occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bird, Brooke, Cohcurred, Kuhn, Moore, Ostrander, Person, Steere, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.