· 6/13/1882
Fox v. Probate Judge
Citations
- 48 Mich. 643
- 111 N.W. 1131
- 1882 Mich. LEXIS 922
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the types of voting restrictions subject to strict scrutiny concern “the equal treatment of voters within the governmental unit holding the election, be it a school district, a city or a state” (citations omitted)
- upholding Arizona’s annexation law that “draws geographical distinctions” between voters living in unincorporated communities
- explaining when different standards of review are applied — after differential treatment is identified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.