Skip to main content
· 6/13/1882

Fox v. Probate Judge

Citations

  • 48 Mich. 643
  • 111 N.W. 1131
  • 1882 Mich. LEXIS 922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the types of voting restrictions subject to strict scrutiny concern “the equal treatment of voters within the governmental unit holding the election, be it a school district, a city or a state” (citations omitted)
  • upholding Arizona’s annexation law that “draws geographical distinctions” between voters living in unincorporated communities
  • explaining when different standards of review are applied — after differential treatment is identified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.