Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the laying of a gas pipeline on a public highway easement did not impose an additional burden on the abutting landowners
• holding that the laying of a gas pipeline on a public highway easement did not impose an additional burden on the abutting landowners
• relying upon the reasoning of New York Central Railroad Co. v. Yarian, 219 Ind. 477, 39 N.E.2d 604 (1942)
• allowing a utility to lay pipe under a public right of way on a road
• placement of gas pipeline along public street was not additional burden on servient estates of abutting landowners
• “Industry has found it more feasible, for example, to move oil or gas through pipe lines in many instances, rather than by truck on the surface along highways.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).