Fox v. Knickerbocker Engraving Co.

Citations

• 165 F. 442
• 91 C.C.A. 386
• 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4781

Syllabus

<p>1. Patents (§ 310*) — Suit foe Infringement — Admission in Pleading.</p> <p>Where the answer to a bill charging infringement of a patent admitted that defendant had during the time alleged made and used articles conforming to the claims of the patent, no further proof is required from complainant on the issue of infringement</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Cent. Dig. § 526; Dee. Dig. § 310.*]</p> <p>2. Patents (§ 324*) — Suit foe Infringement-Increase of Damages by Court.</p> <p>The awarding of treble damages for infringement of a patent under Rev. St. § 4921 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3395), being discretionary with the. court, will not be interfered with by the appellate court unless it appears that there has been an abuse of discretion.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Dec. Dig. § 324.*]</p> <p>3. Patents (§ 328*) — Validity—Photogeaphio Negative.</p> <p>The Fox patent No. 675,272, for a photographic negative, is valid on its face.</p> <p>[Éd. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Dec. Dig. § 328.*]</p>