Fox v. Held

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inspector did not suspend a farm’s license out of malice despite evidence that the inspector was in a spiteful mood and conducted unusually rigorous inspection
• noting that \equal protection does not require that all evils of the same genus be eradicated or none at all\
• holding that six elements of evidence, including that the inspector was in a spiteful mood due to an earlier incident with another farmer and performed an unusually detailed inspection did not constitute a showing that he acted maliciously or with intent to injure
• placing burden on plaintiff to present evidence establishing selective treatment as compared to others similarly situated
• reversing judgment for plaintiff at trial because evidence of malice is insufficient
• reversing judgment for plaintiff at trial because evidence of malice is insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).