Skip to main content
· 3/11/1895

Fox v. Haarstick

Citations

  • 156 U.S. 674
  • 15 S. Ct. 457
  • 39 L. Ed. 576
  • 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2173

Syllabus

<p>In an action upon a contract to sell shares of stock to the plaintiff, the defendant set up allegations of fraud. A jury was waived and the court . found separately and specifically upon all the allegations respecting the contract, and that the contract set up in the complaint was sustained by the evidence. No error was assigned or exceptions taken. Held,</p> <p>(1) 'That this court cannot review those findings ;</p> <p>(2) That they are sufficient to sustain the judgment.</p>

Judges: Shiras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.