District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 11/15/2001
Fox v. Ginsburg
Citations
- 785 A.2d 660
- 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 239
- 2001 WL 1423516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting a statutory provision identical to Section 3104(d)(2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farrell, Wagner, Washington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wallace v. Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-11-15· cited 18×
- Superior Fibre Products, Inc. v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict of Columbia· 2016-01-13· cited 2×
- Skye Mineral Investors, LLC v. DXS Capital (U.S.) LimitedCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2021-07-15
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Fox v. Ginsburg
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.