California Court of Appeal· 8/23/1954
Fox v. Fox
Citations
- 127 Cal. App. 2d 253
- 273 P.2d 585
- 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1329
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding no appeal may lie from an opinion or mere memorandum the clear intent of which is to authorize a future written order or judgment
- deciding no appeal may lie from an opinion or mere memorandum the clear intent of which is to authorize a future written order or judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mussell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-02-17· cited 41×
- In re C.L.T.Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-06-22· cited 37×
- Jenkins v. JenkinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-02· cited 32×
- Bodine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-11-08· cited 18×
- Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1960-04-19· cited 12×
- Vuckan v. McCormickCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-02-17· cited 2×
- In Re CLTAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-06-22
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reimer v. FirpoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-11-25· cited 34×
- Kindig v. Palos Verdes Homes Assn.California Court of Appeal· 1939-06-14· cited 15×
- Butler v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-05-14· cited 14×
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-06-04· cited 4×
- Preston v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 3×
- Grattan v. SilbaughCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1953-12-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.