Fox v. Feltz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “mere reliance on misinformation” does not establish extraordinary circumstances
• plaintiff could not pursue a claim under § 1132(a)(3) because she sought the same relief in her benefits claim under § 1132(a)(1)(B)
• “Since Varity, this court has repeatedly held that beneficiaries can bring a claim under § 1132(a)(3) only if they ‘may not avail themselves of § 1132’s other remedies.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).