Skip to main content
· 5/22/1991

Fox v. Equimark Corp.

Citations

  • 782 F. Supp. 295
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8267
  • 1991 WL 285722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allegations that defendant failed to increase loan loss reserves when substantial losses were virtually certain were insufficient, in part because complaint failed to specify manner in which reserves were improperly established
  • allegations that defendant failed to increase loan loss reserves when substantial losses were virtually certain were insufficient, in part because complaint failed to specify manner in which reserves were improperly established
  • in order to state an actionable claim under the securities laws, the plaintiff must specify how the defendant knew its reserves were inadequate or why it should have increased its reserves earlier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.