Fox v. Doak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it is not error for the district court to reject 11 requested findings of fact where the requested findings are inconsistent with findings 12 of the district court that are supported by substantial evidence
• “In making [a child-custody determination, a court’s] controlling influence should be the welfare and best interests of the child.”
• error cannot be predicated on inconsistencies between judge’s oral remarks from the bench and the written decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).