Fox v. Department of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding removal improper “because the removal notice 17 was facially defective and the deficiencies uncured within the thirty-day statutory period.”
• finding Notice of Removal which alleged that the removing defendants “have been informed and believe that many of the other defendants . . . have not been properly served in this matter” was facially deficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).