Skip to main content
· 8/19/2002

Fox v. Berks

Citations

  • 778 N.E.2d 1141
  • 334 Ill. App. 3d 815
  • 268 Ill. Dec. 519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff alleged that, but for defendants’ negligent representation of her during her divorce case, she would have received a larger portion of the marital estate
  • the plaintiff could not prove that she was damaged because she could not prove that she would have been able to enforce a larger judgment
  • plaintiff alleged that, but for defendants' negligent representation of her during her divorce case, she would have received a larger portion of the marital estate
  • the plaintiff could not prove that she was damaged because she could not prove that she would have been able to enforce a larger judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tully

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.