Fox v. Bebee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The rule in Heck v. Humphrey would have precluded plaintiff’s [civil rights] claims if he had tried to bring them before his conviction was overturned. Plaintiff’s claims thus did not accrue until the state court overturned his conviction.”
• “Courts apply the statute of limitations which the State provides for personal-injury torts. Because plaintiff’s § 1983 claims arose in Kansas, the court applies Kansas’s two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions to his claims.” (internal quotations omitted)
• explaining fabricating evidence is a clearly established constitutional violation
• explaining fabricating evidence is a clearly established constitutional violation
• fabricating evidence is a clearly established constitutional violation
• fabricating evidence is a clearly established constitutional violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).