Skip to main content
· 6/21/2002

Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, National Association of Broadcasters, Intervenors

Citations

  • 293 F.3d 537
  • 352 U.S. App. D.C. 260
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court “ordinarily deems an argument raised for the first time in a petition for rehearing to have been waived” but the practice is “more practical than rigid”
  • “Nor is an agency’s interpretation of a statutory provision defining the jurisdiction of the court entitled to our deference under Chevron.”
  • “Nor is an agency’s interpretation of a statutory provision defining the jurisdiction of the court entitled to our deference under Chevron.”
  • with respect to enforcing forfeiture of arguments that were not raised before the panel at the rehearing stage, “our practice is in fact more practical than rigid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Edwards, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.